Breaking the Institutional Cycle that Quenches the
Life of the Spirit
While doing research
for my book, 2000 years of Charismatic
Christianity, and looking for evidence of Spiritual gifts in church
history, I found something in church history I was not looking for. I
discovered what I call an “institutional cycle” in church history. In this
cycle there comes a spiritual awakening with emphases on life in the Spirit,
freedom, relationship, issues of the heart, etc. The revival lasts for a while
and then inevitably comes the institutional trend where the emphasis shifts to
things like authority, order, governmental structure, etc., and out of the revival
emerges another denomination. I discovered that this institutional cycle has
been occurring since the first century.
“Institutionalism” is
defined as “an emphasis on organization at the expense of other factors.” Something
is always lost in an over-emphasis on organization; and in the church this loss
is always in the area of the freedom and dynamism of the Holy Spirit. In other
words, institutionalism quenches the Spirit and replaces it with ritual,
formality, and a hierarchical leadership that claims to speak for God. What I
discovered was that, throughout history, institutionalism has been the greatest
enemy of revival, and it seems to me that we are seeing this same institutional
process at work in our day.
During the 1990s there
was a powerful move of the Holy Spirit throughout the earth. I remember hearing
the Holy Spirit clearly speak to me in August of 1993 during my daily prayer
walk. He said, “A new wave of Holy Spirit outpouring is coming and will
continue to the end of the century.” It was such a clear word that when I
returned home I opened my calendar and wrote down those words on August 23,
1993. Shortly thereafter, revival broke out at Oral Roberts University, where I
was connected at the time. We saw students praying into the wee hours of the
morning and many being slain in the Spirit across the campus grounds. Praying,
singing, and shouts of praise could be heard, ringing forth from the dorms and
the cafeteria. There were classes in which I was not able to teach because of
the students being overwhelmed by the presence of God. It was an incredible
moment in time. Soon afterwards, we began hearing reports of revival springing
up in other parts of the world.
No, the revival was not
perfect—revival never is. There was much flesh and probably even some demonic
stuff that intruded at times. I am sure God would like to use perfect people,
but the only problem is that he can’t find any. So he uses what is available;
and I would say He has done quite well considering the material He has had to
work with. Nonetheless, in spite of the
problems and defects, this revival impacted many lives around the world and
brought a new sense of liberty and freedom to many.
But since the year 2000
(it was in the works before that) I have been seeing in real life what I had
already seen in church history—an institutionalizing of revival. The emphasis
now, in many quarters, has shifted and is now on authority, structure, and governmental
order. Although expressed in a variety of ways, the most popular approach seems
to be the current emphasis on the restoration of the office of the apostle
along with apostolic order and structure. My basic issue with this approach is two-fold:
(1) ministry and leadership in the New Testament is functional in nature and
not official and (2) there is no prescribed order in the New Testament laid
down by either Jesus or the apostles.[1]
Now, we know that
organization is needed to carry out the work of the ministry. No church or
ministry can carry out the work to which God has called them without some
element of organization. The question is, “How do we know when we have crossed
the line and are institutionalizing a work of God?” Below are five indicators that
indicate that church and ministry are becoming institutionalized. These have
been drawn from a wonderful article by Findley B. Edge entitled “Experiential
of Institutionalized Religion?” Findley, who served for many years as the
Professor of Religious Education at Southern Baptist Seminary, said the Church
is becoming institutionalized . . .
(1) When its adherents are related primarily
to the church as an institution or to the organizations of the church rather
than to the living God.
(2) When the church turns its concern inward
upon itself and is more concerned with its own existence and progress than it
is with the mission for which it was founded.
(3) When the multitudinous activities
required to build up and enlarge the organization becomes identified with
“doing the will of God.”
(4) When means becomes ends
and ends
becomes means. Institutions and organizations which were designed and
intended to be used as a means of serving people may become ends
and the loyalty of the people is determined by their service to the
institution.
(5) When the spirit of religion is lost and
only the form remains.
Another way of saying
it would be, “When the spirit of freedom (revival) is lost, being replaced by
outward forms and authoritarian offices and structures.”
Some years ago, Sue and
I heard Dr. Harvey Cox, of the Harvard Divinity School, speak shortly after he
had completed a two year sabbatical during which he had been studying the history
of the Pentecostal-Charismatic movement. He had also been visiting
Pentecostal-Charismatic churches and ministries around the world, out of which
had come a just completed book entitled Fire
from Heaven. He said one thing that
I never forgot. He said the early Pentecostal revival exploded in growth
because it was “quasi-chaotic.” He meant this as a compliment and was referring
to the fact that at that early stage, the movement/revival had not yet
institutionalized and was being borne along on the dynamism, freedom, and power
of the Holy Spirit.
My prayer is that, as
we move forward in doing His will and advancing His cause, we will walk
carefully; and not be guilty of quenching His Spirit with organizational
offices and structures. Let’s stand fast in the freedom of the Gospel and be
the generation that breaks that “institutional cycle.” As we do, times of
refreshing will surely come from the presence of the Lord (Acts 3:19).
[1] If
you would like to read more of my thoughts on this topic, see my article
entitled, “Why I Have Not Aligned Myself with the Modern Apostolic Movement”
which is posted at http://www.biblicalawakening.blogspot.com/2012/06/why-i-have-not-aligned-myself-with_05.html.
I totally agree Eddie, I've been pondering this very thing for some time now,d I've also been thinkng alot about the whole "sinners prayer" that people say but something happens in the organized church, something gets lost. I haven't come to any conclusions yet except that JC said follow me guys...like, do it this way, don't just try to convert people but make disciples of them... not too sure how this looks but i'll bet my bottom dollar the institutionalized church has dropped the ball here,I'm really stuck here though...I have a problem with the whole structure and I hope I get some answers soon, Peace, love you both, Patti
ReplyDeletePatti, why don't you check out house church? The freedom to be the church instead of going to one is great!
ReplyDelete