8/26/2022
THE AMAZING REVIVAL THAT TRANSPIRED WHEN FREEBORN GARRETSON HEARD AND OBEYED THE VOICE OF GOD
8/23/2022
IS THE MODERN CHURCH REPEATING PAUL'S MISTAKE IN ATHENS?
Have
you noticed that there is no letter from Paul to the church in Athens? Even
though he spent time there and spoke to a gathering of the city’s leading
citizens and most prominent philosophers (Acts 17:19), Athens is never
mentioned again by Paul or any other New Testament writer.
His
preaching obviously had very little impact on the city of Athens. Understanding
the reason, I believe, could help save many contemporary Christians from
self-destruction and enable us to impact our generation with the gospel of
Jesus Christ.
Paul’s Mistake in Athens
Some New Testament
scholars believe that Paul preached a watered-down version of the gospel in
Athens, which resulted in there being no power in his message. Luke recounts
Paul’s sermon to the philosophers on the Areopagus in Acts 22:31.
Interestingly, he quoted two pagan poets, but never mentioned Jesus, the cross,
or His sufferings. The closest he gets to the gospel message is when he tells
them of a “man” whom God had raised from the dead and by whom He would judge
the world.
Paul was obviously
disappointed in the results of his preaching in Athens, and he made a "determination" that he would never repeat that mistake. This is made clear in his first
letter to the Corinthians where he reminded them that when he came to them the
first time, I determined to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ and
Him crucified (I Cor. 2:2).
Remember that
Corinth is 50 miles from Athens and Paul visited Corinth for the first time
after leaving Athens. This first letter indicates that Paul was not happy with
his evangelistic approach in Athens and that he had done some deep soul
searching during the 2 to 3-day journey from Athens to Corinth. He "determined" that he would not make the same mistake in Corinth.
The
Power is in the Message
In this first letter
to the Corinthians, Paul emphasizes the power of the message of the Cross of
Christ and stresses the importance of guarding the essence and content of that
message. For example, in 1:17 he says that Christ did not send him to baptize,
but to preach the gospel—not with words
of human wisdom, lest the cross of Christ be emptied of its power (NIV).
Do we hear what
Paul is saying? He is saying that if we go too far in trying to make the gospel
more cool, hip, and attractive to contemporary culture, we run the risk of
preaching a message that has been emptied of its power. It seems that
this is precisely what happened in Athens. Paul went too far in his effort to make
the gospel acceptable to his Athenian audience and it resulted in him
presenting a powerless gospel. That is why there is no “Epistle to the Church
in Athens.”
Paul Decides to Stay on Message
Now, notice the
change in Paul’s approach the next time he preaches, which is in Corinth. Although
they too are Greeks and value wisdom and philosophy, we do not hear him quoting
any of their philosophers. Instead, we hear him reminding them.
And
I, brethren, when I came to you, did not come with excellence of speech or of
wisdom declaring to you the testimony of God. For I determined not to know
anything among you except Jesus Christ and Him crucified.
The phrase when I came to you refers to his first
visit to Corinth after being in Athens. In Athens he had not mentioned Jesus in
his message at the Areopagus. But now,
arriving in Corinth, he is determined to preach nothing but Jesus Christ and
Him crucified no matter how weak and foolish the message may sound to his audience.
God’s power was
manifest through Paul’s preaching in Corinth and a powerful, if somewhat rowdy,
Christian community was established. Interestingly, we have not one, but two
letters to the church in Corinth and evidence that there was a third one. During
his journey from Athens to Corinth, Paul obviously “purged” the message he had
preached in Athens.
Let’s Allow God to Purge the Message
Some years ago, Sue and I attended an intensive, week-long seminar on world missions at Regent University. The discussions were very much centered on strategies and methodologies for completing and bringing closure to the Great Commission.
After four days of lectures
and discussions, someone suggested that we pray. Sue, being weary, rested her
head on the table at which we were sitting, relieved that she could close her
eyes and rest and no one would know the difference.
Suddenly and
unexpectedly the Spirit of the Lord hit her like a bolt of lightning. She
suddenly sat upright and began to weep and intercede in other tongues. It was
so intense that she went into a hallway and walked back and forth weeping and
praying in the Spirit.
I joined her along
with one or two others and we continued to pray until the burden of prayer
lifted. During the time of intercession Sue said she heard God saying, “You
have been talking all week about strategies and methodologies for taking the
gospel message to the world, but I am concerned about the message you are taking. I
want to purge the message. I want it to be My message that you take to the world."
We Must Not Substitute Style For
Substance
In the modern evangelical and charismatic churches, we tend to put more emphasis on style than substance. A flamboyant, entertaining style may become a substitute for a clear and pure gospel message. This can happen in both preaching and in what we call "worship."
When I first read of the effect of Jonathan Edwards’ preaching on his audiences, I pictured him walking the aisles, shouting, and waving his arms like an old-time Pentecostal or modern charismatic preacher. After all, through his preaching, entire communities were transformed as the masses turned to God with weeping and deep, heart-felt repentance.
I was shocked when I discovered that he wrote out all his sermons and then read them in a monotone voice without any physical movements or gestures, and never moving from behind the pulpit. Being nearsighted, he held his manuscript a few inches in front of his face as he read. It was not his style that produced such change; it was the substance of the message he preached.
I Corinthians 1:21b in the KJV reads, It pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe. This sounds as though Paul is referring to the act of preaching, but the Greek clearly bears out that it is not the act of preaching, but the message that is preached, that saves those who believe. The NIV has it correct by saying, It pleased God through the foolishness of the message preached to save those who believe.
Martin
Luther Discovered the Power of the Message
In Romans 1:16
Paul clearly states that the power to change lives is inherent in the gospel
message itself. He wrote, For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ for
it is the power of God unto salvation . . ..
Martin Luther discovered this truth and it characterized his ministry. In his latter years, he was asked how he, a simple preacher and professor of theology, was
able to have such success against such overwhelming odds, for both the Roman
emperor and the pope had tried to silence him, without success. Luther’s answer
affirms the fact that he had discovered the power that is inherent in the
gospel message itself. He replied,
I simply taught, preached, wrote God’s Word; otherwise, I did
nothing. The Word so weakened the papacy that never a prince or emperor did
such damage to it. I did nothing. The Word did it all
(Hyatt, The Charismatic Luther, 29).
Let’s Preach His Message
There is no “Letter
to the Church in Athens” for a reason. Paul preached a message there that was empty
of power. Let us learn from his example and not make the same mistake in our
day and time. If we will allow God to purge the message we preach, we could yet
see another Great Awakening and this generation impacted by the real and
powerful gospel of Jesus Christ.
Dr. Eddie Hyatt is
an author, Bible teacher, and revivalist. He is the founder of the 1726 Project,
which is dedicated to educating the American populace about the nation’s birth
out of the First Great Awakening. He has written several books on this topic
including, 1726: The Year that Defined America, available from Amazon
and is website at www.eddiehyatt.com
8/05/2022
CHARLES FINNEY SAID THESE 3 ATTITUDES WILL HINDER AND DESTROY REVIVAL IN AMERICA
According to the Pew Research
Center, Christianity in America is declining at an alarming rate. In the 1990s 86%
of Americans identified themselves as Christian. By
2007 that number had dropped to 78.4% and only 7 years later, in 2014, it had
dropped another 6% to 70.6%. By 2021 it had dropped another 7 percentage points
to 63%.
During
the same period, the percentage of Americans who describe themselves as
atheist, agnostic, or “nothing in particular” has increased dramatically. From
2007 to 2021 their number jumped from 16% to 29%. Also, the number of Americans
who identify with non-Christian faiths has grown, especially among Muslims and
Hindus.
These facts should provoke us to ask, “Why?” Why is this
happening despite all our mega churches and conferences, our new apostolic
order, our prayers and intercessions, our prophetic declarations, and our revivals?
Charles G.
Finney (1792-1875, known as the “prince of revivalists,” has something to say
to us in this regard. Finney saw entire communities transformed by the revivals
he spearheaded, and he wrote extensively on the subject.
Whereas today we tend to look for a better
method or different strategy for producing a revival, Finney would say we need
to examine the attitude of our hearts and consider our motives. Here are three
attitudes that Finney says will hinder and destroy revival.
Attitude #1
When Christians Seek
Revival from Selfish Motives
The Pharisees did a lot of good things—praying, fasting,
tithing—but were on the receiving end of the most severe rebukes from Jesus. He
rebuked them, not for “what” they did, but for “why” they did it. Their
self-righteous, prideful motives were abhorrent to the Lord.
This is true when it comes to revival. Are we seeking revival
from pure motives-- to see God’s kingdom advanced and souls come to Christ--or
do we want revival for our own personal advancement and success?
During the revivals of the 1990s, a pastor told how God revealed to him his selfish motive in praying for revival. He was going to his church each morning
at 6 am and praying for revival. One morning the Holy Spirit brought another
church in his city to mind and asked, “What if I choose to begin the revival
for which you are praying in this congregation.” He replied, “Lord, you wouldn’t!”
Finney told of how he encountered so many pastors and churches
wanting revival for very personal and selfish reasons. Some wanted revival to increase their numbers so they could build a new and larger building. Others
wanted revival because they felt competitive with another church in the
community and wanted to raise their status and visibility. Finney said,
I have had a multitude of
letters and requests that I would visit such and such places, and endeavor to
promote a revival, and many reasons have been urged why I should go. But when I
came to weigh their reasons, I have sometimes found every one of them to be
selfish. And God would look upon every one with abhorrence.
Attitude #2
When
Christians Get Proud of Their Revival
One danger
that must be guarded against in times of revival is the temptation to become
proud and puffed up about “our” revival. Throughout history, revivals have come
to an end because ministers and churches got an inflated idea of their own
importance because of God’s blessing on their lives.
Instead of
nurturing a humility and thanking God for His mercy and grace in sending them a
revival, they have begun to think that there must be something special about
themselves. They think, “We must be a notch above other Christians and churches, for
look how God is blessing us.”
This is
dangerous for as I Peter 5:5b says, God resists the proud, but gives grace to
the humble. Finney warned his generation to be on guard against this revival-killing attitude, saying,
Perhaps
it has been published in the papers what a revival there has been in that
church, so they think how high they will stand in the estimation of other
churches all over the land because they have had such a great revival. And so
they get puffed up and vain, and they can no longer enjoy the presence of God.
The Spirit withdraws from them and the revival ceases.
Attitude #3
When
Christians Do Not Feel Their Dependence on the Holy Spirit
When we
begin to think that by our own gifts and talents we can produce a revival, true
revival will evade us. We may produce hyped religious events and emotional
highs, but we will not see a genuine, heaven-sent revival.
During a
prayer drive along the east coast in which we passed through many of the cities
transformed in the Great Awakening, I heard the Holy Spirit say, “You can fake
it, but you can’t make it.”
Finney addressed
this issue head on, describing what happens when ministers and churches begin depending on their own talents and strengths to produce a revival. He said,
Whenever
they get strong in their own strength, God curses their blessings. In many
instances they sin against their own mercies because they get lifted up with
their success, and take credit to themselves, and do not give the glory to God.
There is doubtless a great temptation to this and requires the utmost
watchfulness on the part of ministers and churches, to guard against it, and
not to grieve the Spirit away by vain glorying in men.
The Way Forward from Here
No, we do not need a new method, means, or strategy to see another
Great Awakening. We need a new attitude of heart. It is a time to cast our
crowns, titles, and proud achievements before His throne and acknowledge that
we are nothing apart from His mercy and grace. It is a time to remember Isaiah
66:2 where God reminded His people,
These
are the ones I look on with favor: those who are humble and contrite [broken]
in spirit, and who tremble at my word (NIV).
It is not too late for America. If we
will take seriously His call to humility and prayer, we could yet see a
turn-around that will astound us all—a turn-around initiated, not from
Washington D.C., but from the throne of God.
If My people who are called by My name will humble themselves,
and pray and seek My face, and turn from their wicked ways, then I will
hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin and heal their land.
Dr. Eddie Hyatt is a recognized expert on revivals in history and his book, 2000 Years of Charismatic Christianity, is used as a textbook in colleges and seminaries around he world. He has written several books on America's birth out of the Great Awakening, including 1726: The Year that Defined America, available from Amazon and his website at www.eddiehyatt.com.
7/30/2022
WHAT MUST HAPPEN FOR THE AMERICAN EAGLE TO SOAR ONCE AGAIN
In 1776, the American eagle took
flight and soared on the two wings of faith and reason. Now, 246 years later,
the American eagle seems to be plummeting to her death, her two wings frayed and torn by
a woke generation that is hostile to both faith and reason. Reason may also be referred to as "common sense."
In the European Enlightenment (1685-1815), Christian faith
was rejected and in its place “reason” was exalted as the vehicle for discovering truth. However, because
Christianity is a reasonable faith, based on verifiable historical events, the practical
worldview of the person of the Enlightenment was often quite compatible with that of the person of faith. This was especially true on the American continent.
Colonial America was influenced by the Enlightenment,
but because of the Great Awakening (1726-70) and its emphasis on faith in
Christ, faith and reason existed comfortably side by side in America. This is
why Benjamin Franklin, a self-proclaimed Deist, could have such a close
friendship with the fiery young Methodist revivalist, George Whitefield.
Benjamin Franklin Merged Faith and Reason
Because he saw no real dichotomy between faith and
reason, Franklin entered a business partnership with Whitefield in which he
printed and distributed thousands of Whitefield’s sermons and journals. In doing so, he helped spread the Great Awakening throughout the Colonies. Franklin also
contributed financially to Whitefield’s ministry and the two carried on a
lively correspondence for over thirty years.
So close was the relationship between this older Deist
and fiery, young evangelist, that in 1756 Franklin wrote a letter to Whitefield
proposing that they partner together in establishing a new colony in the
wilderness area of present-day Ohio. He wrote,
I imagine we could do it effectually and without putting the nation at too much expense. What a glorious thing it would be, to settle in that fine country a large strong body of religious and industrious people (Hyatt, 1726: The Year that Defined America, 136)!
Franklin’s worldview, based on reason, was obviously
very close to that of Whitefield, which was based on faith in Christ and
Scripture. Indeed, one Enlightenment philosopher, John Locke, who was widely
read by America’s founders, saw no dichotomy between faith and reason and wrote
a book entitled The Reasonableness of Christianity.
Thomas Jefferson Merged Faith and Reason
Thomas Jefferson, another founder
impacted by the Enlightenment, also saw no dichotomy between faith and reason. For
example, he considered it a reasonable and wise act to take money from the
federal treasury to pay for a Christian missionary to the Kaskaskia Indians of Southern Illinois, and to build them
a chapel in which to worship. Reason informed him that it would improve their
lives and make them a happier people.
Reason also led him to
a high regard for Jesus Christ, which is why he
closed presidential documents with the phrase “In the year of our Lord Christ.”
Reason also led him to declare, “Of
all the systems of morality that have come under my observations, none appear
to me so pure as that of Jesus” (
The merger of reason and Biblical faith is seen in
America’s founding documents. In the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson
wrote, “We hold these truth to be self-evident, that all men are created equal
and that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights . .
..”
By using the phrase “self-evident” Jefferson is
acknowledging that some truths are obvious from nature, reason, and common
sense. He brings faith into the equation when he says that all men are
“created” equal and are endowed by their “Creator” with certain unalienable
rights.
The merger of faith and reason at America’s founding
led the noted philosopher and historian, Michael Novak, to say,
Everywhere
that reason led, Americans found the Bible. If they read Francis Bacon, they
found the Bible. If they read Isaac Newton or John Milton, they found the
Bible. In Shakespeare, they found the Bible. In the world of the founders, the
Bible was an unavoidable and useful rod of measurement, a stimulus to
intellectual innovation (Hyatt, 5 Pillars of the American Republic, 16).
The Present Danger We Face
Here is the danger we face today. Whereas there was a rejection of Christian faith in the Enlightenment, society could still function tolerably well because of the emphasis on reason. After all, God is a reasonable Being who created a reasonable world wherein truth can be discovered by using the reasoning faculties He has given us.
This generation, however, has gone a step beyond the Enlightenment and rejected, not only God, but also reason. There are no common sense, "self-evident" truths for this generation. Objective truth and reality do not exist and therefore cannot be discovered. They are to be created according to "my" whims and desires.
With neither faith or reason to guide them, this new generation cannot define a woman, they believe men can have babies, women can be fathers, and that small children should be given the opportunity to choose their gender.
Without faith or reason to guide them, what matters to this woke generation is how “I” feel at any given moment. If I am a man and decide to identify as a woman, the whole world should accommodate “my” decision, no matter how it affects anyone else.
Such an egocentric, narcissistic mindset can only lead to societal upheaval and anarchy. Without the two wings of faith and reason, the American eagle is in a freefall. We are not, however, without hope!
Restoring the Two Wings to the American Eagle
Like no other time, we must see those two wings of
faith and reason restored to the American eagle. Each of us can play a part
by boldly standing for God, reason, and common sense. I also invite you to join
me and thousands of others in praying for another Great Awakening to roll
across this land like a giant tsunami wave.
Dr. Eddie Hyatt is a Bible teacher and historian with a passion to see America return to her founding principles of faith and freedom. This article is derived from his book, 1726: The Year that Defined America, available from Amazon and his website at http://eddiehyatt.com.
7/11/2022
THOMAS JEFFERSON'S PROMINENT ROLE IN ENDING SLAVERY IN AMERICA
Thomas Jefferson is in the crosshairs
of those on the Left who are demanding the removal of his statues from public
places and the removal of his name from public schools. Interestingly, however, the nation's most famous Abolitionist and most celebrated Civil Rights leader would both disagree.
We must remember that the goal of the Left is not to understand history. Their goal is to control history and manipulate it to further their social/political agenda. In George Orwell's classic book, 1984, Big Brother censored, manipulated, and demonized the past to make his own authoritarian regime appear to be a welcome improvement on the past. And so it is with all secularist, authoritarian movements.
The truth is that at a time when
slavery was accepted and practiced in Africa, Asia, the Middle East and most of
the world, Jefferson, and virtually all of America’s Founders turned against
it. This is clear from both their public statements and their private
correspondence. The eminent economist and historian, Dr. Thomas Sowell, who
happens to be Black, has written of this, saying,
Among
those who turned against slavery in the 18th century were George
Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry, and other American leaders. You
could research all of 18th century Africa or Asia or the Middle East
without finding any comparable rejection of slavery there (Hyatt, 1726: TheYear that Defined America, 90).
The occasion for this unique turn was
the 18th century religious movement in colonial America known
as the Great Awakening. A characteristic of this Awakening was the anti-slavery
sentiments that prevailed throughout the colonies. By the time of the writing
of the Declaration of Independence in 1776, virtually every Founder had come to
agree with John Adams who said,
Every
measure of prudence ought to be assumed for the eventual total extirpation of slavery from the United States . . . I have throughout my whole
life held the practice of slavery in abhorrence (Hyatt, Abolitionist Founding Fathers, 36).
Jefferson was the primary author of
the Declaration of Independence and the nation’s third president. Although born
in a slave-holding colony and into a slave-holding family, he came to see the
evils of slavery and began calling for its elimination, even while holding
slaves.
For example, in a document for
Virginia delegates to the Continental Congress, Jefferson called for an end to
the slave trade, writing, "The abolition of domestic slavery is the great
object of desire in these colonies where it was unhappily introduced in our
infant state."
In an early draft of the Declaration
of Independence, Jefferson excoriated the King of England and accused him of
introducing slavery into the colonies, saying,
He
has waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred
rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never
offended him, captivating them and carrying them into slavery in another
hemisphere (Hyatt, Abolitionist Founding Fathers, 44).
Although the exact words of the above
statement did not make it to the final draft, the principles of “life and
liberty” for “all men” did. Jefferson wrote,
We hold these truths to
be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their
Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty,
and the pursuit of Happiness.
America’s founding generation
understood this statement to be a direct attack on the institution of slavery,
and abolitionists used it in their attacks on that institution. The famous
abolitionist and former slave, Frederick Douglass (1818-95), understood it as
such. In a July 4th speech in 1852, Douglass spoke glowingly of the
Declaration of Independence and exhorted his audience,
The principles contained in that instrument are saving principles. Stand by
those principles, be true to them on all occasions, in all places, against all
foes, and at whatever cost.
In his early years Douglass had
concluded that he had no part in America because of the enslavement of his people; but after years of investigative research he completely changed his thinking.
He realized that the continuation of slavery was not the desire of the Founders
and that they had put their lives on the line by declaring independence from Great Britain and challenging slavery by declaring that "all men are created equal" and have a God-given right for Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
That is why, in the same speech, Douglass showed his
high esteem for Jefferson and all the Founders, saying,
Fellow Citizens, I am
not wanting in respect for the fathers of this republic. The signers of the
Declaration of Independence were brave men. They were great men too—great
enough to give fame to a great age. It does not often happen to a nation to
raise, at one time, such a number of truly great men (Hyatt, Abolitionist Founding Fathers, 52).
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. also
understood Jefferson’s words in the Declaration to be an attack on slavery.
When someone suggested to him that he was an “extremist,” King replied, "Was not Thomas Jefferson an
extremist? – ‘We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created
equal’" (Hyatt, Abolitionist Founding Fathers, 45).
Indeed, in the
18th century, when slavery was accepted and practiced throughout the world,
the words of Jefferson were considered “extreme.” When understood in the
context of the times, Jefferson and America’s Founders were on the cutting edge
of human society in advocating for the abolition of slavery, and proclaiming liberty for all
mankind.
This is why, in
his iconic “I Have a Dream Speech,” Dr. King could declare, “I still have a
dream; it is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.” In the same speech
he went on to say,
When the architects of our Republic
wrote the magnificent words
of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, they were signing
a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note
was a promise that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed
the "unalienable Rights" of "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Dr. King made it clear that the
problem the nation faced was not with the Founders or her founding documents,
but with the fact that succeeding generations had not lived up to the vision of
equality and liberty the Founders had enshrined in those documents.
Abraham Lincoln also believed that succeeding generations had failed to
follow through on the vision of the Founders for life and liberty for all men. In
1858, Lincoln, who had become the newly formed Republican party’s first
candidate for president, declared that the anti-slavery vision of the new party
was the same as that of the nation’s Founders. He said,
In
the way our Fathers originally left the slavery question, the institution was
in the course of ultimate extinction, and the public mind rested in the belief
that it was in the course of ultimate extinction. All I
have asked or desired is that it should be placed back again upon the bases
that the Fathers of our government originally placed it upon (Hyatt, Abolitionist Founding Fathers, 59-60).
If the new emerging generation is to experience American freedom, there must be a return to the nation's founding principles. Pope John Paul II, although Polish, understood this. In a 1997 speech welcoming the new U.S. ambassador to the Vatican, he said,
The continuing success of American democracy depends on the degree to which each new generation, native-born and immigrant, is willing to make its own the moral truths on which the Founding Fathers staked the future of your Republic (Hyatt, Pilgrims and Patriots, 2nd Edition, 156).
This article is derived from the books, Abolitionist Founding Fathers and 1726: The Year that Defined America, by Dr. Eddie Hyatt, who has a calling and commission to point America back to her birth out of a great 18th century Christian Awakening. These and other books by him are available from Amazon and his website at www.eddiehyatt.com.
6/30/2022
DOES AMERICA HAVE A SACRED HERITAGE? DR. KING THOUGHT SO!
Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. believed there was something holy
and sacred about America’s founding. He obviously considered the Jim Crow south,
where he lived and worked, to be a sharp departure from America’s founding
vision. Writing in 1963 from the Birmingham city jail, Dr. King declared,
Our destiny is tied up
with the destiny of America . . . We will win our freedom because the SACRED
HERITAGE of our nation and the eternal will of God are embodied in our echoing
demands.
Frederick Douglass
(1816-1895), the former slave and passionate abolitionist, came to the same
conclusion 100 years before Dr. King. In his early years, Douglass felt he had no
part in America; but after years of investigation and research he completely changed
his thinking. In a July 4th speech in 1852, Douglass called the U.S. Constitution “a
glorious liberty document,” and declared,
Fellow
Citizens, I am not wanting in respect for the fathers of this republic. The
signers of the Declaration of Independence were brave men. They were great men
too—great enough to give fame to a great age. It does not often happen to a
nation to raise, at one time, such a number of truly great men.
Slavery was just not an issue, not
even among intellectuals, much less among political leaders, until the 18th century–and then it was an issue only in Western civilization. Among those who
turned against slavery in the 18th century were George Washington,
Thomas Jefferson, Patrick Henry and other American leaders. You could research
all of 18th century Africa or Asia or the Middle East without
finding any comparable rejection of slavery there (Hyatt, 1726:
The Year that Defined America, 90).
History
shows that it was a great Christian Awakening (1726-1770) in Colonial America that breached
racial and cultural barriers and unleashed anti-slavery outrage throughout the Colonies.
This Awakening resulted in virtually every Founding Father, even
those who owned slaves, taking a public stand against it.
By the time of the writing of the
Declaration of Independence in 1776 and the Constitution in 1787, virtually
every Founder agreed with John Adams, America’s 2nd president, who
declared,
Every measure of prudence ought to be
assumed for the eventual total extirpation of slavery from the United States. I have throughout my
whole life held the practice of slavery in abhorrence
As
a result, America’s founders formulated founding documents that contain no
classifications based on race or skin color. The words “slave” and “slavery”
are nowhere to be found. Instead, the Constitution speaks of “citizens,” “persons,”
and “other persons.”
Indeed, America’s founding generation
understood America’s founding documents to be anti-slavery documents. Douglass came
to this realization and wrote, “Anyone
of these provisions in the hands of
abolition statesmen, and backed by a right moral sentiment, would put an end to
slavery in America” (Hyatt, Abolitionist Founding Fathers, 54-55).
Dr. King understood this original American dream of faith and freedom, which is why, in his iconic “I Have a Dream Speech,” he could say, “I still have a dream; it is a dream deeply rooted in the American dream.” He then declared,
When the architects of our Republic wrote the magnificent words of the Constitution and the Declaration of
Independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every American was to fall heir. This note was a promise
that all men, yes, black men as well as white men, would be guaranteed the
"unalienable Rights" of "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness."
Dr. King made it clear that the problem the nation faced was not with her founding documents, but with the fact that succeeding generations had not lived up to the vision of equality and liberty the Founders had enshrined in those documents. He went on to say,
I have a dream that one day
this nation will rise up and live out the true meaning of its creed: "We
hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.”
In my book, 1726: The Year that Defined America, I have shown how the Great Awakening (1726-70) revitalized
Christian faith throughout the colonies, ignited an anti-slavery movement, and had a direct bearing on the founding of the nation and the formulation of her colorblind, anti-slavery founding documents.
Dr. King obviously knew this, which is why he did not rail against America's Founders, but sought to build on their legacy and the "Sacred Heritage" that they left. Let's pray that this current "woke" generation will learn from him and follow his example.
This article is derived from Dr. Eddie Hyatt’s books, 1726: The Year that Defined America and Abolitionist Founding Fathers, available from Amazon and his website at www.eddiehyatt.com.
6/27/2022
THE PRAYERS OF GEORGE WASHINGTON AND THE BIRTHING OF AMERICA
As
he was preparing to leave home as a young soldier, George Washington’s mother,
Mary Ball Washington, exhorted him, “Remember that God is our only sure trust.”
She also urged him, “My son, neglect not
the duty of secret prayer” (Hyatt, 1726: The Year that Defined America, 131).
The
evidence is overwhelming that Washington
remembered and carried out his mother’s exhortations. It is obvious that prayer
played a prominent role in his life and in the birthing of the United States of
America.
Prayer As a Young Man
In
April of 1891, several of Washington’s descendants, including Lawrence
Washington, Bushrod Washington, and Thomas B. Washington, sold a collection of
his personal items at auction in Philadelphia. Among
the items was a little book filled with daily prayers in Washington’s own
handwriting when he was in his twenties.
Entitled, Daily Sacrifice, these prayers are deeply
devotional and evangelical in nature. For example, the first entry reads, in
part,
Let my heart, therefore,
gracious God, be so affected with the glory and majesty of Thine honor that I
may not do my own works, but wait on Thee, and discharge those duties which
Thou requirest of me.
The following Monday morning, his prayer reads,
Direct my thoughts, words
and work, wash away my sins in the immaculate blood of the Lamb, and purge my
heart by Thy Holy Spirit . . . daily frame me more and more in the likeness of
Thy Son Jesus Christ.
Also, of note is his prayer:
Bless, O Lord, the whole
race of mankind, and let the world be filled with the knowledge of Thee and Thy
Son, Jesus Christ (Hyatt, 1726: The Year that Defined America, 132).
Prayer in Time of War
It is obvious that Washington continued to be a person of prayer.
For example, after accepting the call of the Continental Congress to serve as
Commander-in-Chief of the Colonial army, one of his first actions was to issue
an order that each day was to begin with prayer led by the officers if each unit. He also ordered
that each soldier, unless their duties required them to be elsewhere, was to
observe “a
punctual attendance of Divine services, to implore the blessing of heaven upon
the means used for our safety and public defense.”
That Washington himself was a person of prayer in his
private life was confirmed by Isaac Potts, who lived near Valley Forge,
Pennsylvania where the American Army was quartering under much duress during
the winter of 1774-75. Potts was a Quaker and a pacifist who opposed the war
until he had a life-changing experiencing while riding through the woods one
day during, perhaps, the bleakest period of the war. He said,
I heard a plaintive sound as, of a man at prayer. I tied my horse to a
sapling and went quietly into the woods and to my
astonishment I saw the great George Washington on his knees alone, with
his sword on one side and his cocked hat on the other. He was at Prayer to the
God of the Armies, beseeching to interpose with
his Divine aid, as it was ye Crisis, and the cause of the country, of humanity
and of the world. Such a prayer I never heard from the lips of man. I left him
alone praying. I went home and told my wife I saw a sight and heard today what
I never saw or heard before, and just related to her what I had seen and heard
and observed. We never thought a man could be a soldier and a Christian, but if
there is one in the world, it is Washington (Hyatt, 1726: The Yearthat Defined America, 115-16).
Washington’s Earnest Prayer for the
New Nation
Washington prevailed in prayer. Against overwhelming
odds, the ragtag Colonial army defeated the mighty British war machine. The
British general, Cornwallis, surrendered his entire army to Washington on October
19, 1781.
Having completed his mission, Washington issued a letter
of resignation as commander-in-chief to the Continental Congress. He then wrote
what could be described as a pastoral letter, dated June 14, 1783, to the
governors of the various states. This letter included his “earnest prayer” that
is here quoted in part. He wrote,
I now make it my earnest prayer that God
would have you, and the State over which you preside, in his holy protection;
that he would incline the hearts of the citizens . . . to entertain a
brotherly affection and love for one another . . . and to demean ourselves with
that charity, humility, and pacific temper of mind, which were the
characteristics of the Divine Author of our blessed religion, and without a
humble imitation of His example in these things, we can never hope to be a
happy nation (Hyatt, 1726: The Year that Defined America, 120).
President Washington Prays
After being sworn in as the nation’s first president with his hand on a Bible, Washington presented his first inaugural address, which was filled with references to God. After the ceremony, held in New York City, Washington and Congress proceeded to St. Paul’s chapel where they participated in a prayer and worship service.
Shortly after assuming the presidency, Washington proclaimed a National Day of
Prayer and Thanksgiving. In the proclamation, he gave the reason for the Day of
Prayer, saying,
That we may unite in most humbly
offering our prayers and supplications to the Great Lord and Ruler of Nations
and beseech him to pardon our national sins and other transgressions, to enable
us all, whether in public or private stations, to perform our several and
relative duties properly and punctually, to render our national government a
blessing to all people, by constantly being a government of wise, just and
constitutional laws, discreetly and faithfully executed and obeyed (Hyatt, 1726:The Year that Defined America, 134).
Praying to the Very End
That
Washington continued to be devout in his latter years was confirmed by his nephew Robert Lewis, who lived with Washington and served as his private secretary
during the first part of his presidency. Lewis said he had accidentally
witnessed Washington’s private devotions in his library both morning and
evening. On those occasions he saw
Washington kneeling with a Bible open before him. Lewis understood this
to be Washington’s daily practice.
Mason Locke Weems (1759-1825), who wrote the first biography of Washington after his death, says that he died with a prayer on his lips. Describing Washington's passing, Weems says, "He closes his eyes with his own hands, folds his arms decently on his breast, and then breathing out, 'Father of mercies, take me to Thyself,' he falls asleep."
An Example to Follow
Yes,
our first president was unashamedly a devout person of prayer. There is no question that his prayer life played a primary role in the birthing of America. Modern presidents
and politicians would be wise to follow his example.
This article was derived from Dr. Eddie Hyatt's book, 1726: The Year that Defined America, available from Amazon and his website at www.eddiehyatt.com.






